2000 • Toyota
Corona
Toyota Corona 1.8 i 16V (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.5/100
2000 Toyota Corona vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 1.8 i 16V (117 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Corona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CoronaSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
ToyotaMakeLand Rover
CoronaModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Toyota CoronaSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
—0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
115 HPPower117 HP
155 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CoronaSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CoronaSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
175/70 R14 STyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota CoronaSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
4600 mmLength4368 mm
1695 mmWidth1809 mm
1410 mmHeight1708 mm
1150 KgWeight1510 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2557 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Toyota Corona and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Corona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…