2000 • Toyota
Corona
Toyota Corona 1.6i 16V (105 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Toyota Corona vs 2000 Audi A3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Audi
A3
Audi A3 1.6i (101 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Corona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CoronaSpecificationAudi A3
ToyotaMakeAudi
CoronaModelA3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Toyota CoronaSpecificationAudi A3
—0–100 km/h10,9 s
0 km/hTop speed189 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
105 HPPower101 HP
142 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CoronaSpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
10 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CoronaSpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota CoronaSpecificationAudi A3
4600 mmLength4152 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1410 mmHeight1427 mm
1110 KgWeight1090 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2513 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Toyota Corona and 2000 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Corona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…