DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Corolla vs 2003 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Corolla

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMitsubishi
CorollaModelL 200
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

190 km/hTop speed142 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
79 HPPower95 HP
147 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank75 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4385 mmLength4500 mm
1695 mmWidth1655 mm
1475 mmHeight1570 mm
1190 KgWeight1380 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Corolla and 2003 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Corolla leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…