1999 • Toyota
Corolla
Toyota Corolla 1.6i (110 Hp) 1999Overall Score55.5/100
1999 Toyota Corolla vs 1999 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 1.6 i 16V 4WD (97 Hp) 1999Overall Score55.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Corolla
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
55.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CorollaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
ToyotaMakeChevrolet
CorollaModelTracker
1999Model year1999
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Toyota CorollaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
110 HPPower97 HP
145 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CorollaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CorollaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/70 R13; 175/65 R14Tyre size195/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota CorollaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4365 mmLength3650 mm
1695 mmWidth1630 mm
1315 mmHeight1650 mm
—Weight1235 Kg
2465 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Toyota Corolla and 1999 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Corolla leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…