2000 • Toyota
Corolla
Toyota Corolla 1.5i (100 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Toyota Corolla vs 2000 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 1.6 i 16V 4WD (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Corolla
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CorollaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
ToyotaMakeChevrolet
CorollaModelTracker
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
2Doors3
Performance
Toyota CorollaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
100 HPPower97 HP
137 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CorollaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CorollaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size195/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota CorollaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4285 mmLength3650 mm
1695 mmWidth1630 mm
1305 mmHeight1650 mm
980 KgWeight1235 Kg
2465 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Toyota Corolla and 2000 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Corolla leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…