DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Toyota Corolla vs 2003 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Corolla

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 6 points.

53.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
CorollaModel323
2012Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
175 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1364 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower95 HP
190 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4540 mmLength4390 mm
1760 mmWidth1705 mm
1470 mmHeight1410 mm
1315 KgWeight1115 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Toyota Corolla and 2003 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Corolla leads the E-Kıyasla score by 6 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…