2000 • Toyota
Corolla
Toyota Corolla 1.4 (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score41.25/100
2000 Toyota Corolla vs 1998 Subaru Forester Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.5 4WD (165 Hp) 1998Overall Score42/100
WINNER
Subaru Forester
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
41.25–42
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CorollaSpecificationSubaru Forester
ToyotaMakeSubaru
CorollaModelForester
2000Model year1998
—Body typeCrossover
—Seats5
—Doors5
Performance
Toyota CorollaSpecificationSubaru Forester
—0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed178 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
97 HPPower165 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CorollaSpecificationSubaru Forester
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption11,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Toyota CorollaSpecificationSubaru Forester
—Length4450 mm
—Width1735 mm
—Height1590 mm
—Weight1380 Kg
—Wheelbase2525 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Toyota Corolla and 1998 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSRenault Scenic vs Toyota Corolla1999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSSsangYong Korando vs Toyota Corolla1999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSSsangYong Istana vs Toyota Corolla1999 and 2000 model years
VSNissan Primera vs Toyota Corolla1999 and 2000 model years
VSPeugeot 406 vs Toyota Corolla1999 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…