DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 AC Cobra vs 2000 Lincoln Navigator Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Navigator

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ACMakeLincoln
CobraModelNavigator
1996Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSUV
2Seats8
2Doors5

Performance

5,2 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement5408 cc
370 HPPower300 HP
579 NmTorque481 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank114 lt
18 ltUrban consumption19,6 lt
12 ltExtra-urban consumption14,7 lt
—Average consumption18,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/65 VR15Tyre size275/75 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4115 mmLength5202 mm
1735 mmWidth2030 mm
1245 mmHeight1948 mm
980 KgWeight2532 Kg
2285 mmWheelbase3023 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 AC Cobra and 2000 Lincoln Navigator approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Navigator leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…