DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 BMW M5 vs 2020 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW M5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 24.75 points.

96.5–71.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW M5SpecificationMazda CX-5
BMWMakeMazda
M5ModelCX-5
2008Model year2020
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

BMW M5SpecificationMazda CX-5
4,7 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
250 km/hTop speed188 km/h
4999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
507 HPPower165 HP
520 NmTorque213 Nm
10Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW M5SpecificationMazda CX-5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
21,7 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
14,4 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW M5SpecificationMazda CX-5
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
7Gears6
—TransmissionAT
255/40 R19; 285/35 R19Tyre size19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW M5SpecificationMazda CX-5
4855 mmLength4555 mm
1846 mmWidth1840 mm
1469 mmHeight1670 mm
1780 KgWeight1555 kg
—Luggage capacity503 lt
2889 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

BMW M5

No additional feature records are available.

Mazda CX-5Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlLane Keeping AssistCollision Avoidance SystemComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsHeated Steering WheelLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsSunroofUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 BMW M5 and 2020 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW M5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 24.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

Comments are loading…