DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Toyota Celsior vs 2000 Lincoln LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Celsior

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeLincoln
CelsiorModelLS
1997Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3968 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
280 HPPower245 HP
402 NmTorque360 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/60 R16 98HTyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4995 mmLength4925 mm
1830 mmWidth1860 mm
1435 mmHeight1425 mm
1640 KgWeight1710 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2908 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Toyota Celsior and 2000 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Celsior leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…