DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Toyota Celica vs 1995 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Celica

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeAudi
CelicaModel80
1995Model year1995
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,1 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2166 ccEngine displacement2309 cc
136 HPPower133 HP
196 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,6 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R15 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4496 mmLength4482 mm
1750 mmWidth1695 mm
1295 mmHeight1408 mm
1165 KgWeight1310 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Toyota Celica and 1995 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Celica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…