E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Toyota Celica vs 2001 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–48.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Toyota CelicaSpecificationFord Ranger
ToyotaMakeFord
CelicaModelRanger
1999Model year2001
CoupeBody typePick-up
—Seats4
—Doors2

Performance

Toyota CelicaSpecificationFord Ranger
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
170 HPPower154 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm
—Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Toyota CelicaSpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank62 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Toyota CelicaSpecificationFord Ranger
—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size225/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Toyota CelicaSpecificationFord Ranger
—Length4763 mm
—Width1786 mm
—Height1648 mm
—Weight1397 Kg
—Wheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Toyota Celica and 2001 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2000 Volvo S70VS1999 Toyota CelicaVolvo S70 vs Toyota Celica2000 and 1999 model years2000 Volvo V70VS1999 Toyota CelicaVolvo V70 vs Toyota Celica2000 and 1999 model years2000 Nissan SunnyVS1999 Toyota CelicaNissan Sunny vs Toyota Celica2000 and 1999 model years2000 Toyota HiluxVS1999 Toyota CelicaToyota Hilux vs Toyota Celica2000 and 1999 model yearsImage unavailableVS1999 Toyota CelicaVolvo V90 vs Toyota Celica2000 and 1999 model years

Comments are loading…