1989 • Toyota
Celica
Toyota Celica 1.8i 16V (115 Hp) 1989Overall Score62.25/100
1989 Toyota Celica vs 1987 Audi 80 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1987 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.8 E (112 Hp) 1987Overall Score61.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Celica
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
62.25–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CelicaSpecificationAudi 80
ToyotaMakeAudi
CelicaModel80
1989Model year1987
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Toyota CelicaSpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h9,6 s
195 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
115 HPPower112 HP
155 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CelicaSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank68 lt
11 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
—Average consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CelicaSpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Toyota CelicaSpecificationAudi 80
4420 mmLength4393 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1300 mmHeight1397 mm
1200 KgWeight1050 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2546 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1989 Toyota Celica and 1987 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Celica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…