DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Toyota Celica vs 2004 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Toyota CelicaSpecificationMG ZT
ToyotaMakeMG
CelicaModelZT
2004Model year2004
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Toyota CelicaSpecificationMG ZT
8,7 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
205 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1794 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
143 HPPower160 HP
170 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Toyota CelicaSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Toyota CelicaSpecificationMG ZT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Toyota CelicaSpecificationMG ZT
4335 mmLength4740 mm
1735 mmWidth1780 mm
1320 mmHeight1410 mm
1070 KgWeight1440 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Toyota Celica and 2004 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…