DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 BMW M5 vs 2021 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW M5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 16.25 points.

98.5–82.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW M5SpecificationFord Mondeo
BMWMakeFord
M5ModelMondeo
2015Model year2021
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

BMW M5SpecificationFord Mondeo
3,9 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
250 km/hTop speed223 km/h
4395 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
600 HPPower190 HP
700 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW M5SpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW M5SpecificationFord Mondeo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7 DCTGears6
—TransmissionPowerShift
265/40 R19 102Y; 295/35 R19 104YTyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW M5SpecificationFord Mondeo
4910 mmLength4871 mm
1891 mmWidth1852 mm
1457 mmHeight1482 mm
1870 KgWeight1587 kg
—Luggage capacity429 lt
2964 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

BMW M5

No additional feature records are available.

Ford MondeoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlCollision Avoidance SystemDriver Fatigue DetectionComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 BMW M5 and 2021 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW M5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 16.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

Comments are loading…