1986 • BMW
M5
BMW M5 3.5 (286 Hp) 1986Overall Score79.75/100
1986 BMW M5 vs 1991 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1991 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 3.0i V6 24V Turbo (255 Hp) 1991Overall Score80.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
79.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW M5SpecificationNissan Cedric
BMWMakeNissan
M5ModelCedric
1986Model year1991
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
BMW M5SpecificationNissan Cedric
6,5 s0–100 km/h—
245 km/hTop speed240 km/h
3453 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
286 HPPower255 HP
340 NmTorque343 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
BMW M5SpecificationNissan Cedric
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,5 ltUrban consumption—
—Average consumption9,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW M5SpecificationNissan Cedric
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/70 R14Tyre size205/65 R15 V
—ABSYes
Dimensions
BMW M5SpecificationNissan Cedric
4620 mmLength4780 mm
1700 mmWidth1745 mm
1400 mmHeight1410 mm
1430 KgWeight1630 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2760 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1986 BMW M5 and 1991 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…