DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Alfa Romeo 159 vs 2011 FAW Bora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 159

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeFAW
159ModelBora
2011Model year2011
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
190 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
120 HPPower125 HP
280 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4660 mmLength4376 mm
1828 mmWidth1735 mm
1424 mmHeight1446 mm
1575 KgWeight1310 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Alfa Romeo 159 and 2011 FAW Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 159 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…