2000 • Toyota
Carina
Toyota Carina 1.5i (100 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Toyota Carina vs 2000 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 1.6 i 16V 4WD (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Carina
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CarinaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
ToyotaMakeChevrolet
CarinaModelTracker
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Toyota CarinaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
100 HPPower97 HP
137 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CarinaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CarinaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/75 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota CarinaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4495 mmLength3650 mm
1695 mmWidth1630 mm
1410 mmHeight1650 mm
1130 KgWeight1235 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Toyota Carina and 2000 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Carina leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…