E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 BMW M4 vs 2017 Audi RS 4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
RESULT

Tie

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.

98.5–98.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW M4SpecificationAudi RS 4
BMWMakeAudi
M4ModelRS 4
2016Model year2017
CoupeBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

BMW M4SpecificationAudi RS 4
4,2 s0–100 km/h4,1 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2894 cc
450 HPPower450 HP
550 NmTorque600 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW M4SpecificationAudi RS 4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
12,0 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW M4SpecificationAudi RS 4
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8 tiptronic
265/30 ZR20 94Y; 285/30 ZR20 99YTyre size265/35 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW M4SpecificationAudi RS 4
4671 mmLength4781 mm
1870 mmWidth1866 mm
1392 mmHeight1404 mm
1515 KgWeight1715 Kg
2812 mmWheelbase2826 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 BMW M4 and 2017 Audi RS 4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.

Comments are loading…