DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Caldina vs 2003 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Caldina

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
CaldinaModelC-Max
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,6 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
152 HPPower136 HP
200 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4510 mmLength4330 mm
1740 mmWidth1820 mm
1445 mmHeight1600 mm
1240 KgWeight1391 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Caldina and 2003 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Caldina leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…