DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 BMW M3 vs 2005 Chrysler Crossfire Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Crossfire

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

84.5–85.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeChrysler
M3ModelCrossfire
2002Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

5,5 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
250 km/hTop speed255 km/h
3246 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
343 HPPower330 HP
365 NmTorque420 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
17,9 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
8,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
12,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/45 R18; 255/40 R18Tyre size225/40 R18; 255/35 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4492 mmLength4058 mm
1780 mmWidth1766 mm
1363 mmHeight1296 mm
1655 KgWeight1455 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 BMW M3 and 2005 Chrysler Crossfire approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Crossfire leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…