DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 BMW M3 vs 2000 BMW M3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW M3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

83.5–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW M3SpecificationBMW M3
BMWMakeBMW
M3ModelM3
1998Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
4Seats5
2Doors2

Performance

BMW M3SpecificationBMW M3
5,6 s0–100 km/h5,2 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3201 ccEngine displacement3246 cc
321 HPPower343 HP
350 NmTorque365 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW M3SpecificationBMW M3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank63 lt
17,0 ltUrban consumption17,8 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption11,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW M3SpecificationBMW M3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17; 245/40 R17Tyre size225/45 R18; 255/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW M3SpecificationBMW M3
4433 mmLength4492 mm
1710 mmWidth1780 mm
1340 mmHeight1372 mm
1560 KgWeight1495 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 BMW M3 and 2000 BMW M3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW M3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…