DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Toyota C-HR vs 2017 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
C-HRModelMondeo
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1987 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
144 HPPower187 HP
188 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
50 ltFuel tank53 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption2,8 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
CVTGears—
225/50 R18Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4348 mmLength4867 mm
1796 mmWidth1852 mm
1565 mmHeight1501 mm
1497 KgWeight1504 Kg
2639 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Toyota C-HR and 2017 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…