2008 • Toyota
Blade
Toyota Blade 3.4 24V6 (280 Hp) 2008Overall Score74.25/100
2008 Toyota Blade vs 2008 Volvo XC70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Volvo
XC70
Volvo XC70 3.2 (238 Hp) 2008Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Blade
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
74.25–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota BladeSpecificationVolvo XC70
ToyotaMakeVolvo
BladeModelXC70
2008Model year2008
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota BladeSpecificationVolvo XC70
6,6 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
180 km/hTop speed215 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
280 HPPower238 HP
206 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota BladeSpecificationVolvo XC70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption16,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,5 lt
—Average consumption11,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Toyota BladeSpecificationVolvo XC70
4220 mmLength4838 mm
1760 mmWidth1861 mm
1515 mmHeight1604 mm
1250 KgWeight—
2600 mmWheelbase2815 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Toyota Blade and 2008 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Blade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSHonda Ridgeline vs Toyota Blade2008 and 2008 model years
VSNissan Teana vs Toyota Blade2008 and 2008 model years
VSRenault Espace vs Toyota Blade2008 and 2008 model years
VSRenault Vel Satis vs Toyota Blade2008 and 2008 model yearsImage unavailableVSHolden UTE vs Toyota Blade2008 and 2008 model yearsComments are loading…