2011 • Toyota
Blade
Toyota Blade 2.4 (167 Hp) 2011Overall Score51.25/100
2011 Toyota Blade vs 2006 Suzuki Forenza Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Suzuki
Forenza
Suzuki Forenza 2.0 (120 Hp) 2006Overall Score52/100
WINNER
Suzuki Forenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
51.25–52
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota BladeSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
ToyotaMakeSuzuki
BladeModelForenza
2011Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Toyota BladeSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
167 HPPower120 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota BladeSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota BladeSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota BladeSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
4220 mmLength4500 mm
1760 mmWidth1725 mm
1515 mmHeight1445 mm
1250 KgWeight1250 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Toyota Blade and 2006 Suzuki Forenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Forenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…