DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Toyota Belta vs 2012 Skoda Rapid Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeSkoda
BeltaModelRapid
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,4 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
106 HPPower105 HP
145 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption4,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,4 lt
—Average consumption3,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R14; 185/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4300 mmLength4483 mm
1895 mmWidth1706 mm
1460 mmHeight1461 mm
—Weight1265 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2602 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Toyota Belta and 2012 Skoda Rapid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…