DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Toyota Belta vs 2012 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFiat
BeltaModelBravo
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
106 HPPower105 HP
145 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank57 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4300 mmLength4336 mm
1895 mmWidth1792 mm
1460 mmHeight1498 mm
—Weight1320 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Toyota Belta and 2012 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…