DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Toyota Belta vs 2012 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Belta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeCitroen
BeltaModelC3
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h16,5 s
0 km/hTop speed154 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1124 cc
86 HPPower60 HP
124 NmTorque94 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/65 R14; 185/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4300 mmLength3941 mm
1895 mmWidth1728 mm
1460 mmHeight1524 mm
—Weight1010 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2466 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Toyota Belta and 2012 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Belta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…