2011 • Toyota
Belta
Toyota Belta 1.3 (86 Hp) 2011Overall Score46.5/100
2011 Toyota Belta vs 2011 Skoda Citigo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Skoda
Citigo
Skoda Citigo 1.0 (60 Hp) 2011Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Belta
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota BeltaSpecificationSkoda Citigo
ToyotaMakeSkoda
BeltaModelCitigo
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
4Doors3
Performance
Toyota BeltaSpecificationSkoda Citigo
13,0 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement999 cc
86 HPPower60 HP
124 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota BeltaSpecificationSkoda Citigo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption5,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota BeltaSpecificationSkoda Citigo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size165/70 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota BeltaSpecificationSkoda Citigo
4300 mmLength3563 mm
1895 mmWidth1641 mm
1460 mmHeight1478 mm
—Weight932 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2420 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Toyota Belta and 2011 Skoda Citigo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Belta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…