DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Toyota Belta vs 2010 Fiat Qubo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Belta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFiat
BeltaModelQubo
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h15,2 s
0 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1360 cc
86 HPPower73 HP
124 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption8,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4300 mmLength3959 mm
1895 mmWidth1716 mm
1460 mmHeight1735 mm
—Weight1255 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Toyota Belta and 2010 Fiat Qubo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Belta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…