DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Toyota Belta vs 2008 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Belta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeNissan
BeltaModelMicra
2008Model year2008
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h16,3 s
0 km/hTop speed154 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1240 cc
86 HPPower65 HP
124 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption7,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size165/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4300 mmLength3715 mm
1895 mmWidth1660 mm
1460 mmHeight1525 mm
—Weight980 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Toyota Belta and 2008 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Belta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…