DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1988 BMW M3 vs 1990 Mazda Eunos Cosmo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Eunos Cosmo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

72.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeMazda
M3ModelEunos Cosmo
1988Model year1990
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

6,7 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2302 ccEngine displacement2616 cc
200 HPPower230 HP
240 NmTorque294 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank72 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 VR15Tyre size215/60 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4345 mmLength4815 mm
1680 mmWidth1795 mm
1370 mmHeight1305 mm
1165 KgWeight1510 Kg
2565 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1988 BMW M3 and 1990 Mazda Eunos Cosmo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Eunos Cosmo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…