DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Toyota Avanza vs 2016 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Avanza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeNissan
AvanzaModelMicra
2016Model year2016
MPVBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1329 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
97 HPPower98 HP
121 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank41 lt
—Urban consumption5,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,7 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—TransmissionManual
185/70 R14Tyre size14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4190 mmLength3825 mm
1660 mmWidth1665 mm
1695 mmHeight1510 mm
1135 KgWeight955 kg
—Luggage capacity265 lt
2655 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Nissan MicraDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsSunroofUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Toyota Avanza and 2016 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Avanza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…