DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Toyota Auris vs 2010 Toyota Probox Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Auris

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
AurisModelProbox
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1364 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
90 HPPower88 HP
205 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4245 mmLength4195 mm
1760 mmWidth1695 mm
1515 mmHeight1525 mm
1280 KgWeight1030 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Toyota Auris and 2010 Toyota Probox approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Auris leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…