DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Toyota Aristo vs 2006 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeAlpina
AristoModelB3
2005Model year2006
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,1 s
0 km/hTop speed260 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement3300 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
432 NmTorque335 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption16,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
225/55 R16Tyre size225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4488 mm
1800 mmWidth1757 mm
1435 mmHeight1352 mm
1680 KgWeight1620 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Toyota Aristo and 2006 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…