DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Toyota Alphard vs 2004 SsangYong Rexton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Rexton

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeSsangYong
AlphardModelRexton
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2364 ccEngine displacement2295 cc
160 HPPower143 HP
221 NmTorque209 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption15,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,4 lt
—Average consumption11,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size235/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4720 mm
1830 mmWidth1870 mm
1935 mmHeight1760 mm
—Weight1815 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2828 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Toyota Alphard and 2004 SsangYong Rexton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…