DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Toyota Alphard vs 2008 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Alphard

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeVolvo
AlphardModelC70
2008Model year2008
MinivanBody typeCoupe - Cabriolet
7Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
160 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2362 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
159 HPPower140 HP
220 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank62 lt
14 ltUrban consumption12,8 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
12 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size215/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4582 mm
1830 mmWidth1820 mm
1935 mmHeight1400 mm
—Weight1646 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Toyota Alphard and 2008 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Alphard leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…