DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Toyota Alphard vs 2006 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Alphard

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeVolvo
AlphardModelV50
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2362 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
159 HPPower170 HP
220 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank62 lt
14 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
12 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4522 mm
1830 mmWidth1845 mm
1935 mmHeight1457 mm
—Weight1483 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Toyota Alphard and 2006 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Alphard leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…