DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Toyota 4runner vs 2006 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
RESULT

Tie

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.

73.75–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeVolvo
4runnerModelS40
2006Model year2006
SUVBody typeSedan
5/7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,8 s
0 km/hTop speed230 km/h
3956 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
236 HPPower220 HP
361 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
87 ltFuel tank62 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
265/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size205/55 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4805 mmLength4476 mm
1910 mmWidth1770 mm
1760-1805 mmHeight1454 mm
1950 KgWeight1545 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Toyota 4runner and 2006 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…