DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Toyota 4runner vs 2015 Toyota Highlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
4runnerModelHighlander
2012Model year2015
SUVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,3 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3956 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
270 HPPower280 HP
377 NmTorque337 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
90 ltFuel tank65 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
10,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
12,3 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain—
5Gears—
265/70 R17; 245/60 R20Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4823 mmLength4865 mm
1925 mmWidth1925 mm
1780-1816 mmHeight1730 mm
2120 KgWeight2205 Kg
2789 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Toyota 4runner and 2015 Toyota Highlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…