DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Toyota 4runner vs 2015 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
4runnerModelCX-9
2010Model year2015
SUVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3956 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
270 HPPower273 HP
377 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank76 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
10,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
12,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
265/70 R17; 245/60 R20Tyre size245/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4823 mmLength5232 mm
1925 mmWidth1935 mm
1780-1816 mmHeight1727 mm
2120 KgWeight1958 Kg
2789 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Toyota 4runner and 2015 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…