DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Toyota 4runner vs 1999 Acura RL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeAcura
4runnerModelRL
1999Model year1999
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,0 s
175 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3378 ccEngine displacement3474 cc
183 HPPower208 HP
294 NmTorque297 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
11,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/75 R15; 265/70 R16Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4539 mmLength4980 mm
1689 mmWidth1810 mm
1689-1745 mmHeight1430 mm
1740 KgWeight1625 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2910 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Toyota 4runner and 1999 Acura RL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…