DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Toyota 4runner vs 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Land Cruiser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeToyota
4runnerModelLand Cruiser
1996Model year2000
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

14,7 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
150 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2982 ccEngine displacement2982 cc
125 HPPower125 HP
295 NmTorque295 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank90 lt
15 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/75 R15; 265/70 R16Tyre size215/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4539 mmLength4290 mm
1689 mmWidth1730 mm
1689-1745 mmHeight1855 mm
1730 KgWeight1775 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2365 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Toyota 4runner and 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Land Cruiser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…