DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Toyota 4runner vs 1998 Land Rover Defender Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

56.25–55.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeLand Rover
4runnerModelDefender
1996Model year1998
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats6
5Doors2

Performance

14,7 s0–100 km/h17,5 s
150 km/hTop speed130 km/h
2982 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
125 HPPower122 HP
295 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
15 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption8,8 lt
—Average consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/75 R15; 265/70 R16Tyre size205/80 R16 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4539 mmLength3880 mm
1689 mmWidth1790 mm
1689-1745 mmHeight2059 mm
1730 KgWeight1870 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Toyota 4runner and 1998 Land Rover Defender approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…