DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Toyota 4runner vs 2010 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
4runnerModelRanger
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typePick-up
5/7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2694 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
157 HPPower143 HP
241 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
90 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,0 ltUrban consumption—
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
265/70 R17; 245/60 R20Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4823 mmLength5075 mm
1925 mmWidth1805 mm
1780-1816 mmHeight1745 mm
1948 KgWeight—
2789 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Toyota 4runner and 2010 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…