DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Tofas UNO vs 1999 Tofas Siena Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas UNO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeTofas
UNOModelSiena
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
170 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1372 ccEngine displacement1372 cc
73 HPPower71 HP
108 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3689 mmLength4100 mm
1562 mmWidth1626 mm
1425 mmHeight1445 mm
820 KgWeight1025 Kg
2362 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Tofas UNO and 1999 Tofas Siena approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas UNO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…