DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Tofas Tempra vs 2000 Honda Odyssey Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Odyssey

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeHonda
TempraModelOdyssey
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors4

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
210 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2254 cc
148 HPPower150 HP
186 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption14,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,8 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
195/60 R14VTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4354 mmLength4770 mm
1695 mmWidth1795 mm
1445 mmHeight1630 mm
1195 KgWeight1490 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Tofas Tempra and 2000 Honda Odyssey approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Odyssey leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…