DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Tofas Tempra vs 1994 Alfa Romeo 146 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas Tempra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeAlfa Romeo
TempraModel146
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
195 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1712 cc
119 HPPower129 HP
162 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank51 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,6 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4355 mmLength4257 mm
1695 mmWidth1712 mm
1445 mmHeight1425 mm
1150 KgWeight1225 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Tofas Tempra and 1994 Alfa Romeo 146 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…