DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Tofas Tempra vs 2005 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 7 points.

46.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeRenault
TempraModelClio
1998Model year2005
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
177 km/hTop speed163 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
86 HPPower65 HP
130 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption5,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,7 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4472 mmLength3773 mm
1695 mmWidth1639 mm
1500 mmHeight1417 mm
1035 KgWeight1035 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2471 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Tofas Tempra and 2005 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 7 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…