DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Tofas Tempra vs 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas Tempra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeMitsubishi
TempraModelSpace Runner
1998Model year1998
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h17,8 s
177 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
86 HPPower82 HP
130 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4472 mmLength4270 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1500 mmHeight1665 mm
1035 KgWeight1260 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Tofas Tempra and 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…